>"Also, at this point, I'm not sure what could possibly be enough proof to at least start considering the option seriously"
Have I not? Did you look at any of my other articles? This is the only skeptical one. I have three more which assume UAPs are alien visitors, maybe they would be more to your liking.
As for your argument concerning scale, I don't think that's relevant to the analogy. In either case observations were inconsistent with physics. You can produce an *apparent* physical object that defies the laws of physics if it's a projection of some sort. Small movements at the point of projection translate to very fast motion and abrupt changes in direction of the projected image/light.
I am not trying to shit in your cereal. I can tell you really want to meet aliens. Me too. But a single skeptical article out of four I've so far written about aliens seems entirely called for to me and not in the least unreasonably dismissive.